For evaluator panels, IME organizations, and specialty practices
Complex records. Review-ready reports.
Attunement turns medical records, interview notes, and assessment data into source-linked histories and report drafts. Less manual preparation for your team. Clinical judgment stays with the evaluator.
Report draft · Relevant medical history
Synthetic example
Claimant reported low back pain after a lifting incident at work on 03/14/2023.
Rec 2 · p.3
Lumbar MRI on 04/02/2023 showed a mild L4–L5 disc bulge without nerve root compression.
Rec 5 · p.14
Completed eight sessions of physical therapy with partial improvement in reported pain.
Rec 7 · p.2
Source · Radiology_2023-04-02.pdf · page 14
EXAM: MRI lumbar spine without contrast.
IMPRESSION:
1. Mild disc bulge at L4–L5. No significant canal stenosis or nerve root compression.
Does the source support the statement?
Supports
Edit
Flag for QA
The output
See the report. Check the source.
Turn scattered records into a structured starting point for review. Follow cited statements back to the underlying documents, make corrections, and decide what belongs in the final report.
Case records
5 documents · 260 pages
Intake_Questionnaire.pdf · 12 pp
PCP_Notes_2021–2024.pdf · 186 pp
Radiology_2023-04-02.pdf · 22 pp
PT_Discharge_2023.pdf · 9 pp
Interview_Notes.docx · 31 pp
Report draft · History of injury and treatment
Claimant reported low back pain after lifting a 40 lb box at work on 03/14/2023 and was seen by primary care two days later.
PCP · p.41
Lumbar MRI on 04/02/2023 showed a mild L4–L5 disc bulge without nerve root compression.
Radiology · p.14
Reviewer edit: “moderate” → “mild” to match the source impression.
Completed eight physical therapy sessions between April and June 2023, with partial improvement in reported pain.
PT · p.2
At interview, claimant described difficulty sitting longer than 30 minutes.
Interview · p.7
Source · Radiology · page 14
EXAM: MRI lumbar spine without contrast.
FINDINGS: Vertebral body heights are maintained. Conus terminates normally.
IMPRESSION:
1. Mild disc bulge at L4–L5. No significant canal stenosis or nerve root compression.
Does this passage support the statement?
Supports
Partly
Doesn’t support
Start from the output
An assembled history and report sections, not a blank template or an intake form.
02
Open the citation
Each cited statement opens the document, page, and passage it was drawn from.
03
Check, correct, decide
A citation shows where a statement came from. Your reviewer confirms whether the source actually supports it — and edits when it doesn’t.
Synthetic example for illustration. No patient data.
Why it matters
Less assembly. Clearer review. More capacity for your team.
Reduce the manual work between receiving a case file and reviewing a report draft.
001
Reduce preparation work
Spend less time organizing records and rebuilding patient histories before the evaluator can begin reviewing.
002
Start with more consistent drafts
Bring histories and report sections into a structured starting point instead of assembling each case from scratch.
003
Make the evidence easier to check
Follow cited statements back to their source records before approving the report.
For organizations
For the teams behind the evaluators.
Give your record-preparation and clinical teams a source-linked starting point for each case. Evaluate Attunement on a defined set of records before expanding its role in your reporting workflow.
01 · Records in
The case file your team already receives
Medical records, interview notes, and assessment materials, uploaded per case, including scanned documents.
→
02 · Review
A source-linked draft for review
Histories and report sections, each statement cited to the page it came from. Your team checks and corrects before anything is used.
→
03 · Handoff
Into your existing report process
Reviewed sections move into your current templates, QA, and delivery. Platform integrations, where needed, are scoped as a separate project.
What does the preparation team receive?
An organized case file: records grouped by source, key facts extracted with citations, and a structured history ready for review.
What does the evaluator review?
Draft history and report sections, with every cited statement linked to its source passage. The evaluator edits, rejects, or approves, and remains responsible for the conclusions.
How does it fit what you already use?
Attunement sits alongside your case-management platform, client portal, and QA process. It does not replace scheduling, billing, or referral management.
Attunement drafts the record-based material. Causation, impairment, and other expert determinations stay with the evaluator.
How it works
From case files to a draft your team can review.
1
Upload the case records
Bring together the medical records, interview notes, and assessment materials needed for the report.
2
Review the extracted information
Check the information against its source documents and correct it before using it in the draft.
3
Assemble the report draft
Generate structured history and report sections with citations back to the supporting material.
4
Apply clinical judgment
Edit and finalize the report through your existing review process. The evaluator remains responsible for the conclusions.
Pilot evaluation
Start with representative cases. Measure the work that matters.
Evaluate Attunement alongside your current process on a defined set of cases. Compare preparation time, reviewer effort, corrections, and report turnaround before deciding how to expand.
Measure
Preparation time
Hours from receiving the case file to a draft that is ready for review.
Measure
Reviewer effort
Clinician and quality-assurance time spent checking and editing the draft.
Measure
Corrections required
What had to change before the output was usable, and why.
Measure
Report turnaround
Elapsed time from case receipt to the final, signed report.
We measure total human effort, not just draft-generation speed, and match cases by volume and complexity so a short, straightforward file isn’t compared with a large, difficult one.
Security
Built for your security review.
Organizations handling medical records need specifics, not badges. We’ll walk your security and compliance team through exactly how Attunement handles case data.
Data handling
Where case records are stored and processed, and how they are protected in transit and at rest.
Retention and deletion
How long case data is kept, and how your organization requests its deletion.
Model providers and subprocessors
Which third parties process data on our behalf, and under what terms.
Training use
Our policy on whether customer records are used to train models.
Access controls
Who on your team can see which cases, and the controls available today.
BAA process
How we put a business associate agreement in place with your organization.
FAQ
What organizations ask first.
001
What does my team actually receive?
For each case: source records organized by document, extracted facts with citations, and draft history and report sections structured for review. Nothing is final until your evaluator approves it.
002
Which work still requires human review?
Your team checks extracted information against the source records and corrects the draft. The evaluator makes every clinical and expert determination, including causation and impairment, and remains responsible for the final report.
003
How are citations checked?
Each cited statement links to the document, page, and passage it was drawn from. A citation shows where a statement came from; the reviewer confirms whether the source actually supports it and edits when it does not.
004
How does the output fit our existing systems?
Attunement works alongside your current platform. Reviewed content moves into your existing report templates and QA process. Any deeper integration is scoped separately with your team.
005
How are sensitive records handled?
Attunement is designed to support HIPAA-aligned workflows, with safeguards for data handling, access control, and storage. As part of your review, we walk your team through data handling, retention, subprocessors, and our BAA process.
006
How is organizational pricing scoped?
Organizational pricing is scoped to your case volume and workflow. We start with a defined pilot on representative cases, so pricing reflects what you have measured.
Discuss your organization’s workflow.
Bring a representative case. We’ll show you what your team would review, and how it would fit your current process.
© 2026 Attunement. All rights reserved.
Built in San Francisco